ECJ 5 February 2015, C-317/14 (European Commission – v – Kingdom of Belgium), Nationality discrimination

Belgian law requires candidates applying for a post in the public service to provide evidence...

<strong>ECJ 5 February 2015, C-317/14&nbsp;(European Commission &ndash; v &ndash; Kingdom of Belgium), Nationality discrimination</strong>

Belgian law requires candidates applying for a post in the public service to provide evidence...

ECJ 28 January 2015, case C-688/13 (Gimnasio Deportivo San Andrés SL, in liquidation - v - Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGGS) and Fondo de Garantía Salarial), Transfer of undertaking

Gimnasio is a commercial company whose main activity consisted in the management of the Escuela...

<p><strong>ECJ 28 January 2015, case C-688/13&nbsp;(Gimnasio Deportivo San Andr&eacute;s SL, in liquidation - v - Tesorer&iacute;a General de la Seguridad Social (TGGS) and Fondo de Garant&iacute;a Salarial), Transfer of undertaking</strong></p>

Gimnasio is a commercial company whose main activity consisted in the management of the Escuela...

ECJ 28 January 2015, case C-417/13 (ÖBB Personenverkehr AG – v – Gotthard Starjakob), Age discrimination

Under the Austrian legislation that applied until 2012, service completed before the age of 18...

<strong>ECJ 28 January 2015, case C-417/13&nbsp;(&Ouml;BB Personenverkehr AG &ndash; v &ndash; Gotthard Starjakob), Age discrimination</strong>

Under the Austrian legislation that applied until 2012, service completed before the age of 18...

2015/5 Supreme Court reverses doctrine on cadre/non-cadre discrimination (FR)

Different treatment in terms of benefits amongst different categories of employees, set by company or collective bargaining agreements and negotiated with representative trade unions, is presumed to be justified.

2015/5 Supreme Court reverses doctrine on cadre/non-cadre discrimination (FR)

Different treatment in terms of benefits amongst different categories of employees, set by company or collective bargaining agreements and negotiated with representative trade unions, is presumed to be justified.

2015/51 An order to perform other work can constitute harassment, even if the work falls within job description (CZ)

The employer is authorised to assign work that is within the agreed type of work set out in the employment contract to employees, in accordance with the employer’s needs. However, at the same time, the exercise of this right must not be used to intimidate the employee in ‘revenge’ for the employee having defended his or her rights previously.  

<p><strong>2015/51 An order to perform other work can constitute harassment, even if the work falls within job description (CZ)</strong></p>

The employer is authorised to assign work that is within the agreed type of work set out in the employment contract to employees, in accordance with the employer’s needs. However, at the same time, the exercise of this right must not be used to intimidate the employee in ‘revenge’ for the employee having defended his or her rights previously.